30天好方法助你冲刺GRE写作

30天好方法助你冲刺GRE写作,一起来看看吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

30天好方法助你冲刺GRE写作

第一、练打字。不要用word，现在的office 都可以自动修改了，你用word的话你都不知道自己的拼写有多烂。不要用金山词霸，打开那个，你就不知道你背5000 单词只能用500的道理。就用写字板。写完贴出来，都这时候了还要面子?打字格式要注意，逗号要放对，前引号后引号别乱。要是你打字速度慢，那就得多练习啦，别以为考试的时候有很多时间，别想着什么有2个小时。比笔考宽松多了。那是带填表和中间休息时间的。计算机可不会让你提前偷看答案!尤其是一些mm们指甲该剪的剪，该修的修，这不是要漂亮的时候，到时候你两个手指戳啊戳，黄花菜都凉了。兄弟们你们也别乐，别以为自己灌水大牛就打字一定快，到时候你不细心。你要是打出来什么bt，嘿嘿，你就等着电脑评分吧。以上按照个人打字速度和正确率自己掌握，20天为上限。该项不计入30天正常准备时间表。

第二，看题目。对题目的讨论，对题目的理解分析，对一般水平的同学来说，不是在考试的时候当场就能做到100%的，也不是什么猴哥孙远那可笑的提纲可以负责的。 一个issue题目它的逻辑性分析，跟Toefl作文的审题不是一个概念。在bbs讨论， 我看是最好的方法了。其实那issue pool里面，真正需要思考分析的题目，不超过一半，一天看5个题目的分析，参加讨论，30天就是150个绝对够了。这部分每天只 需要1个小时，你要是灌水别说我时间没给够哦。

第三，看范文，现在ETS的权威论文也就那么几篇，精华区也有，但是还是每天有bt 问在哪里啊?能不能发我信箱啊?找找就那么难?一个issue5分和6分范文的分析， 你需要安排2个小时，根据各人水平和喜好，或者背诵，或者摘抄，范文的使用奥妙自己去体会吧，难道我还得告诉你这句能用，那句不能用不成?范文的研究最好放在30天的中间10天搞定。

第四，写作文，前三个是不是跟写作文没什么关系啊?我大嫂是个坐在电脑前就觉得写不出来的人，我哥们呢是个不坐在电脑前面就写不出来的人，人跟人不一样。那么第一阶段的时间就有长有短，但是最长也要在10天内彻底适应在电脑前敲作文。 这10天你可以天马行空，只要你觉得用英文写东西还能忍受，那就用英文写，你喜欢体育，就写小贝去皇马你有什么感想，你要是喜欢经济，就写美国和中国的农产品大战 你喜欢IT，就写新新人类，你喜欢历史，就写英德空战、工业革命。尽快找到写英文的感觉。要是你写个250字就跟挤牙膏一样难的话，每天大概写1到1.5个小时。

那么第二个十天，就要根据范文，写文章的结构!第一段要写什么，第二段要写什么，你脑子里一定要清楚，你这段要写什么，别信马由缰，满嘴跑火车。 也别觉得自己句子短，用词难看，意思清楚最重要。也别羡慕人家，45分钟写了556个字!又不是塞字数。要能忍住，首先把文章的脉络弄清楚。用时1个小时最后10天，实战!45分钟issue，30分钟rgument，中间不休息!把你闹钟上上，开到最响吧。

这样大概每天总共用2到3个小时，其实写作文也不是背单词，你时间长就背得多，关键是要思考，而不是时间积累，又不是玩传奇。再有空就看看孙远的工具箱，那大概是那本书里最有用的东西了，看看nec4也成，我觉得用处不大，背一背也许有帮助，背不下来怎么办?我让你背下来了吗?

不用别想一些诸如作文用词不好，怎么办、句子太短怎么办、句式单调怎么办等不实际的东西，空中楼阁我不会，自己也没孙远，新东方能吹，什么保证4分，保证5分。我只能说你按照我的时间表，能把文章的脉络弄清楚写出来人家能看懂，能看到底就over了。追求一些虚拟的目标既不切实际又浪费时间。

GRE issue写作优秀实例：非主流学科

题目：

Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science.

研究界的一些非主流领域，比如星象学、占卜术和意念及超自然探索，在社会中起到了很重要的作用，因为它们满足了人们无法从主流科学获得的需求。

正文：

As for the claim that these non-stream areas of inquiry will satisfy the human needs, we already have sufficient empirical evidence that this will simply not be correct. For nearly fifty centuries we have been pursuit the various human needs and requirement through research in both non-stream areas and traditional sciences. Yet the majority apparent and equipment, even the way of thinking are the benefits from orthodox science. In fact, as non-stream areas of inquiry, astrology, fortune and psychics and paranormal pursuits are lasting in thousands years, which has been the advent of methods catering exclusively to human inborn curiosities in various aspects. The more reasonable conclusions that compare with mainstream science; non-stream area of inquiry has actually served to satisfy more human inborn curiosities than the human needs.

More over, in my view non-stream area of inquiry will continue to thrive for same reason that people still go out for the expedition of unknown fields: we all need to "get away" from our familiar routine and surroundings from time to time. Will mainstream alter this inborn desire? Certainly not. In short, non-stream area of inquiry is a manifestation of edge-side approach for variety and for exploration. This edge-side approach is why humans have come to use constellation for defining their characteristics, and will just surely make a decision on whether these couples are suitable and whether they have a fate that they will have a boy in the certain year.

However, the speaker unfairly assumes that these areas are therefore vital to society. Were these the case, I would entirely agree that people should treat this kind of inquiry as one of important fields like mainstream science. But, non-stream areas of inquiry are not primarily about reasoning and logical approach. Instead, It is about self-deception and false hope, even fantastic ideas and delusion. Could anyone honestly claim that these fantastic ideas and delusion serves as a suitable substitute for reasonable planning and imaging on their work and life? Surely not. The physical world is laden with a host of such delight that we humans are compelling to experience down-to-earth.

In fact, non-stream areas of inquiry might actually harm society due to its irrational and unreasonable actions. Even more significantly, to the extant on a personal level, stubborn adherence to irrational belief in the face of reason and empirical evidence can lead to self -righteous arrogance, intolerance, anti-society behavior, and even hatred. As a result, many people who previously would not have the courage to present the abnormal behavior will soon conduct the strange action under the Instigation from these areas.

Admittedly, not mainstream science but astrology, fortune and psychics and paranormal pursuits might eventually satisfy human inborn curiosities other than basic needs, as the wanted information could be collected without any science process. The happiness oriented from lucky fate and fortune that can be decided by one's strive of whole life can now be hypothesized without any efforts. And the despaired people will insight his new life through a good word from man-made forecast system based on astrology. To the extent that the pressure keep rise accompany with increased development of industrializing in the modern society, more and more people will seek console from non-stream areas of inquiry as a result. Yet it would be absurd to claim that only satisfying the curiosities alone will be the reason why this kind of inquiry could be vital for society.

In sum, non-stream areas of inquiry might be legitimate insofar as they afford many people psychological solace in life. However, due to the feature of irrational and unreasoning, it would not be a vital role in our society.

GRE issue写作优秀实例：现代技术

题目：

In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."

电视时代的读书已经不像以前那么重要了。人们通过看电视学到的和他们读书所能学到的一样多。

正文：

In my experience, it is true the importance of books is largely reduced by television, as well as other media methods. However, even we can watch many programs which contain what can be read in books, reading books is still a attracting way to obtain knowledge and entertainment, since it can provide a space to image, and the power of language is unpredictable.

Modern technology has brought us a lot of ways to see the world, this is especially true when we consider about televisions. By giving realistic images and sound, we can see many places where we can never go to, as well as watch scientific programs about diversified knowledge. The Discovery Channel, for instance, has presented many adventure programs, produced by experts and tourists who are able to go to fat places where we may never have change to reach, such as Antarctica, deserts and so forth. During the past we may need books with photos and illustration to know such places,but now we can experience the journey through televisions, like we are there ourselves. Moreover, some experiences that will never exist in real world can also be expressed by televisions, with the modern digital unreal world technology, including computer graphics and special movie photographing. Another scientific program produced by BBC, Walk With The Dinosaurs, has brought us into a period millions of years ago, showing us the extincted animals by computer technology. There has never been a book can give us such experience, but televisions have done.

Besides television, other media methods can also take roles, including internet, cyber books and movies, making our ways to learn much more direct and convenience. Consider how you can download a book on the internet, with both pictures and articles in it, saving much time and money, and how you can browse a website, where the information is much quicker than books can pass. In that sense, books are truly less important due to the modern technology.

Nevertheless, books are still indispensable, according to its separated charm. By reading a book, we can only obtain words and articles, leaving images to be built in our minds, which is totally diversified from televisions. The books can provide us a creative way to obtain knowledge and experience. Although modern movie technology has made the scientific fiction realistic, those books describe unreal future world are still very popular, since the audience may find the movies show them a not satisfying image, while they can have better senses in their minds.Moreover, another consideration making books still active and useful is the limit of resource. Producing a television program asks for many people, from actors to directors, as well as a huge cost. By contrast, writing a book just asks for intellect, and some pieces of paper. This is especially true when it comes to certain kinds of television programs, which contains large amount of computer graphics and hard to make. That is why many movies are based on existing novels, such as Harry Potter, Star Wars, Lord of Ring and so forth.

It might be tempting to think internet and computer can be alternative methods instead of books, however, in my view such concerns are still unwarranted. As we know, computer screens may do harm to our eyes, especially when we stare at small words displayed on them. And if we are on the ways of tourism, or lying on beds, it is hard to take a computer, even laptop. Many people may take real books as more reliable, when they are holding them in their hands.

To sum up, both televisions and books are necessary for our life, as well as other media. They work in different ways, and serve our interests separately, nevertheless as a whole system. We may develop new technology to make books obtained in smaller and healthy computers, or we may even make televisions set into a new kind of implement. But consider the current situation, books are still playing their role in our daily life, and surely will be consistent for a long time.

30天好方法助你冲刺GRE写作相关文章：

1.BEC商务英语写作考试经验分享